ENCYCLOPEDIA 4U .com



Encyclopedia Home Page

Google
  Web Encyclopedia4u.com

 

Solved board games

A two-player game can be "solved" on several levels.
  1. Ultra-weak: In the weakest sense, solving a game means proving whether the first player will win, lose, or draw from the initial position, given perfect play on both sides.
  2. Weak: More typically, solving a game means providing an algorithm which secures a win for one player, or a draw for either, against any possible moves by the opponent, from the initial position only.
  3. Strong: The strongest sense of solution requires an algorithm which can produce perfect play from any position, i.e. even if mistakes have already been made on one or both sides. For a game with a finite number of positions, this is always possible with a powerful enough computer, by checking all the positions. However, there is the question of finding an efficient algorithm, or an algorithm that works on computers currently available.

Table of contents
1 Solved games
2 Partially solved games

Solved games

  • Awari (a game of the Mancala family)
    • Solved by Henri Bal and John Romein at the Free University in Amsterdam, Netherlands (2002). Either player can force the game into a draw.
  • Connect Four
    • Solved by both Victor Allis (1988) and James Allen (1989) independently. First player can force a win.
  • Gomoku
    • Solved by Victor Allis (1993) First player can force a win.
  • Hex
    • Completely solved (definition #3) by several computers for board sizes up to 6x6.
    • Jing Yang has demonstrated a winning strategy (definition #2) for board sizes 7x7, 8x8 and 9x9. [1]
    • John Nash showed that all board sizes are won for the first player (definition #1).
    • The dicovery of an efficient general algorithm for an NxN board is unlikely as the problem has been shown to be NP-hard.
  • Nim
    • Completely solved for all starting configurations.
  • Nine men's morris
    • Solved by Ralph Gasser (1993). Either player can force the game into a draw. [1]
  • Pentominoes
    • Weakly solved (definition #2) by H. K. Orman. It is a win for the first player.
  • Qubic
    • Solved by Patashnik (1980).
  • Three Men's Morris
    • Trivially solvable. Either player can force the game into a draw
  • Tic-tac-toe
    • Trivially solvable. Either player can force the game into a draw

Partially solved games

  • Checkers
    • Endgames up to 8 pieces have been solved. Not all early-game positions have been solved, but almost all midgame positions are solved. Contrary to popular belief, Checkers is not completely solved.
  • Chess
    • Completely solved (definition #3) by retrospective computer analysis for all 2- to 5-piece endgames, counting the two kings as pieces. Also solved for pawnless 3-3 and most 4-2 endgames.
  • Go
    • Solved (definition #3) for board sizes up to 4x4. The 5x5 board is partially solved. [1] Humans usually play on a 19x19 board (which has an enormous complexity). Therefore solving the game appears very unlikely. On the other hand, a heuristic algorithmic solution might be achievable in the future. While not mathematically complete, it could give good results in practice, perhaps beating even the best human players.
  • Reversi
    • solved on a 4x4 and 6x6 board as a second player win.
  • mnk-games
    • It is trivial to show that the second player can never win. Almost all cases have been solved weakly for k <= 4. Some results are known for k = 5. The games are drawn for k >= 8.

See Also: Board game complexity

External links

References





Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.



Copyright © 2005 Par Web Solutions All Rights reserved.
| Privacy

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Solved board games".